[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:36:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.4 |
Am Freitag, dem 25.02.2022 um 08:18 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
> Am Freitag, dem 25.02.2022 um 00:08 +0100 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> > >
> > > See https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/commits/guile2-bytecode Let me
> > > know if this is miraculously sufficient to make people happy and I can
> > > open a merge request.
> >
> > I was going to write a longer reply before this came, but
> > this mostly obviates it. Am I understanding it correctly that
> > you can copy the bytecode from Linux binaries to cross-compiled
> > MingW ones even if this is not automated for now?
>
> That is my understanding and the claim I'm making since last year, but
> I haven't tested this yet.
Yes, works exactly as expected:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1239
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, (continued)
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2022/02/26
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Luca Fascione, 2022/02/26
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/24
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2022/02/25
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/25
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/25
- Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=