[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slanted Beams thickness,Slanted Beams thickness
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Slanted Beams thickness,Slanted Beams thickness |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:46:49 +0000 (UTC) |
> Lilypond handles slanted Beams in a geometrically weird way, that
> is, the thickness is not measured as the shortest distance between
> the opposing sides of the boundary, but as vertical distance. This
> results in Beams getting optically thinner and closer the higher the
> slope is. But we can very easily factor this out by adjusting the
> thickness to the slope. In fact if we want to achieve a real
> thickness theta the adjusted thickness would need to be
> theta·sqrt(1 + slope²). See attached an experimental example.
Looks good! However, I don't fully agree with the thickness values in
your experimental example. For very steep angles the beam appears a
little bit too thick IMHO; I think there should be a correction
factor.
Werner
Re: Slanted Beams thickness, Carl Sorensen, 2022/03/25