[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC) |
>> BTW, the term 'public domain' is problematic in Europe, since this
>> US law construct doesn't necessarily mean the same in all
>> countries, in particular not in Germany.[*]
>>
>> Maybe it should be changed to CC0
>> (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed) for
>> further contributions?
>
> I'm not seeing clearly into what that means for us. LSR is based in
> Italy (hosted on a server provided by the University of Milan). If
> a German citizen contributes a snippet, which definition of 'public
> domain' applies?
This is exactly the issue. By using CC0, the legal impacts are
minimized.
At the time of inventing the LSR, such copyright issues were handled
in a rather lax way. Today, we (unfortunately) have to take a more
informed point of view.
Werner
- Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Kevin Barry, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Kevin Barry, 2022/10/21
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Thomas Morley, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, David Kastrup, 2022/10/20