Re: markup->string

[David Kastrup]

Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:

> Le 15/11/2022 à 14:17, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> Alternatively, providing something approaching the previous behavior
>> under a different name, assuming that this functionality has at least
>> some motivation or possibility to continue existing.
>
>
>
> It's not a behavior change, just a mundane calling convention
> change that makes the function more flexible and consistent
> with interpret-markup. No "functionality" is being removed.

If it's "mundane", why would the conversion result in a complex
replacement?

-- 
David Kastrup