[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ghostscript disabled features and EPS
|
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
|
Subject: |
Re: Ghostscript disabled features and EPS |
|
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jan 2023 11:49:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.2 |
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 00:56 +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> I just realized one thing about the Ghostscript trimming that
> was extensively discussed on -user some time ago
> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-11/msg00045.html):
>
> The regtest markup-eps.ly does not compile on official 2.24 binaries.
>
> The reason is that it embeds an EPS file that uses the /Helvetica 15
> selectfont
> idiom.
Hm yes, I never thought about that use case.
> Now, \postscript is kind of bad in the first place, but an EPS file
> with /Helvetica 15 selectfont is perfectly valid. Thus, shouldn't
> we stop trimming Ghostscript in this way?
Yes, we likely have to. I'll see how much bigger that actually is, or
if we can potentially still include the C059 fonts only once.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part