RE: "Wrong type argument in position 1" error and other questions

[Fairchild]

Kevin -

Yes, if:

1) The output from 2.4.6 is what you expect, and

2) No one points out a pertinent change from 2.4.6 to 2.6.0.

Please reduce to minimum necessary to show the problem.

                        - Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Nowaczyk [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:09 PM
To: Fairchild
Subject: RE: "Wrong type argument in position 1" error and other questions


So if it compiles in 2.4.6 but not in 2.6.0 is this a
bug that I should report to the bugs list?

--- Fairchild <address@hidden> wrote:

> Kevin -
> 
> I looked at it.  Your truncated file compiles
> without error in version
> 2.4.6.
> 
> The output looks strange, attached.
> 
>                         - Bruce

 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com