Re: Macro pre-processing?

[darius]

I've used it quite a bit as well, but that was a couple of
years ago. More recently, Han-Wen has shown be how I could
achieve most of what I needed using better integrated constructs.

M4 worked fine, quoting kind of killed me though...

D.

Quoting joe ferguson <address@hidden>:

> I have used M4 as a preprocessor, and it worked quite well.  Then I 
> found out the proper construct for what I wanted to do, so I dropped it 
> on that little project.  But I wouldn't hesitate to use it again if I 
> got stuck like I was at that time.  M4: http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/
> 
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> >>LilyPond is powerful, and I'd like to see more of that power made
> >>more easily accessible. I'm not asking for changes to the basic
> >>syntax at all--anything I'd come up with would be a totally optional
> >>pre-pass system.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Try m4.
> >
> >
> >    Werner
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >lilypond-user mailing list
> >address@hidden
> >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> Joe Ferguson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 
>