[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triangle chord notation
From: |
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) |
Subject: |
Re: triangle chord notation |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT) |
eyolf wrote:
>
>
> The alternative setup to Ignatzek - how many of you have ever used it? Or
> seen
> it in use?
>
>
The "alternative" shown in LP to the Ignatzek is never used from what I've
seen. For example it names maj7 as #7 and minor 3rd as b3. This is just
silly and #7 is just plain wrong. The default chord names in LP are pretty
good actually if you bother to use an exceptions list for all the "add"
whatever's it can sometimes generate. I'm pretty happy with the names for
the most part, slash chords however are an ad-hoc to begin with, since I use
std notation anyway I can name the whole inversion. The chord names staff
is just a comping guide for me.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/triangle-chord-notation-tf2042072.html#a5641332
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
- triangle chord notation, Paul Scott, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Eyolf Ostrem, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/08/03
- Re: triangle chord notation, David Raleigh Arnold, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, Stewart Holmes, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, eyolf ostrem, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, Johannes Schöpfer, 2006/08/05
- Re: triangle chord notation, Eyolf Ostrem, 2006/08/05
- Re: triangle chord notation, David Raleigh Arnold, 2006/08/11
- Re: triangle chord notation, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/08/05