[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triangle chord notation
From: |
Johannes Schöpfer |
Subject: |
Re: triangle chord notation |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:00:14 +0200 |
> >> The "o" with no slash for diminished and "+" for augmented 5th forms
> are
> >> widely accepted though.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, but (a) the "o" can mean the diminished fifth only,
> Not correctly. The circle always means fully diminished and the slashed
> circle means half diminished. I agree that it is potentially confusing
> and this a good reason for using 7b9.
> > or the full
a chord without extension is a chord with three voices e.g. "c"="c e g".
so "c/o" should be "c es ges" and "c/o7 should be "c es ges beses".
this means that theoretically "c/o" an "c/o(with slash)" have the same thre
notes without 7.
johnny
--
http://www.johannes-schoepfer.de
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
- triangle chord notation, Paul Scott, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Eyolf Ostrem, 2006/08/02
- Re: triangle chord notation, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/08/03
- Re: triangle chord notation, David Raleigh Arnold, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, Stewart Holmes, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, eyolf ostrem, 2006/08/04
- Re: triangle chord notation, Johannes Schöpfer, 2006/08/05
- Re: triangle chord notation, Eyolf Ostrem, 2006/08/05
- Re: triangle chord notation, David Raleigh Arnold, 2006/08/11
- Re: triangle chord notation, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/08/05
- Problems with certain chord names, Andre Schnoor, 2006/08/05
- Re: triangle chord notation, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/08/05