[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?
From: |
Adam James Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:31:19 -0700 |
Perhaps two examples - one manually beaming non-tuplets->tuplets and
one manually beaming tuplets->non-tuplets (maybe just the examples
below) - could be added to the 2.11 manual under "tuplets?" I'd be
happy to write up a little chunk of text if that would help.
Best,
Adam
On 9/10/07, Adam James Wilson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nevermind - I've answered my own question - here it is, for those interested:
>
> r16[ g16 \times 2/3 {r16 e'8] }
>
> Best,
> Adam
>
> On 9/10/07, Adam James Wilson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > It seems you can beam together tuplets followed by non-tuplets (v. 2.11):
> >
> > \times 2/3 {c'16[ c'8 } c'16 c'16]
> >
> > But beaming together non-tuplets followed by tuplets fails with an
> > "unexpected ']'" error:
> >
> > c'16[ c'16 \times 2/3 {c'16 c'8 } ]
> >
> > Any known methods/hacks to get the second beaming example to work?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Adam
> >
>
- how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Adam James Wilson, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Adam James Wilson, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?,
Adam James Wilson <=
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Valentin Villenave, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Graham Percival, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Neil Puttock, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Adam James Wilson, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Neil Puttock, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Valentin Villenave, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/09/11
- Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets?, Graham Percival, 2007/09/11