|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: how to beam non-tuplets with tuplets? |
Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:22:19 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20061113 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge8 |
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/9/11, Neil Puttock <address@hidden>:Well, I'm no programmer, so that could explain why I've never given it a second thought.Still; you're used to write (inside parentheses), and not outside( parentheses) aren't you? :)The problem is, as Mats says, it's not specific to beaming; it applies equally to things like slurs and ties. If a snippet is to be submitted to LSR, it needs to be more generalized.I tried to make it general in the following snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=321 As always, please correct me if you notice English aberrations...
Fine, but I'm sure we will see the same basic question coming back in other situations, where the curly braces instead belong to a \repeat{...} or \relative{...} or \grace{...} or ... and sooner or later we will exhaust both snippet writers as well as the users trying to search the growing amount of snippets. The solution is to try to make the general principles as clear as possible in the manual, so you don't have to include a specific example of every single special case in the LSR. /Mats
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |