Re: GDP: renaming Program {usage, reference}

[Graham Percival]

Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> Sorry - my fault, I was thinking of the Program Usage, which to a large
> extent has  to do with how to write code to produce a certain output (the
> LP-book part) leaving bits and pieces which not necessarily belongs
> together with the notation reference thematically, but which on the other
> hand is so few pages, dealing with the fundamentals of how to run the
> program, that it seems logical to have it in one place. 

I don't follow -- especially the "to a large extent".

In the newly-renamed Application Usage, is there anything other than 
chapter 4 which you believe should be in NR?  I really can't see 
anything of the sort.

Now, chapter 4 is debatable.  But with the exception of 4.6.3, this 
chapter is dealing with including lilypond input inside lilypond-book -- 
the NR remains the source of information about lilypond input.

As such, I decided it made more sense in AU than in NR.  I'll grant that 
it might be nice to include info like 4.6.3 in a later chapter of the 
NR; sorting out this kind of thing *is* on my list.

My mind could be changed on this issue,
- Graham