[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp:
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:24:48 +0200 |
2008/8/31 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:49:53 +0200
> Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
>> >
>> > As long as lilypond-book is included there is a dependancy on latex.
>>
>> lilypond-book it is also able to process e.g. a docbook file and
>> still we don't have a dependency on docbook.
>
> It can also handle html. It would be silly to claim that lilypond
> (or lilypond-book) depends on Firefox because of this feature.
Not so silly if lilypond-book needed to call firefox to work, as it
does with latex.
> Isn't this exactly what the "recommends: " field in .deb files is
> for? lilypond-book should recommend latex, docbook, texinfo, and
> www-browser.
it does need latex, it does not need docbook (I wonder), it does not
need www-browser. So we have to levels of recommendness:
latex is recommended if you want to produce tex files, this is what
I'd call a dependance.
docbook AFAIK and www-browser are recommended to view the output, this
is what I'd call a pure recommendation.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
- Re: Lilypond's debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypond, (continued)
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/08/30
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Rob Canning, 2008/08/30
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2. 10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/30
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Karl Hammar, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Graham Percival, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Valentin Villenave, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Karl Hammar, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Karl Hammar, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Francisco Vila, 2008/08/31
- Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/08/31
- Re: live cd-with lilypond, Valentin Villenave, 2008/08/28
- Re: live cd-with lilypond, Wilbert Berendsen, 2008/08/29
- Re: live cd-with lilypond, Stefan Thomas, 2008/08/29