[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Questions on beaming and barring
From: |
Nick Payne |
Subject: |
RE: Questions on beaming and barring |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:16:10 +1000 |
Thanks again. One final (I hope) question. When the duration of the barre
causes it to start on one stave and finish on another, that presents two
problems in the output:
1. On the stave where the barre continues, it starts slightly to the left of
the very beginning of the stave rather than above the first note on the stave.
2. The bar number at the start of the stave gets moved from its normal position
to above the line for the barre.
Is there any way around this short of generating the output, seeing whether any
barres are split across staves, and then manually stopping and starting them to
avoid this behaviour.
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Puttock [mailto:address@hidden
Hi Nick,
2008/9/19 Nick Payne <address@hidden>:
> Neil
>
> Thanks. I used your function definition in a short test and it worked just as
> I wanted. Strangely, however, when I used the function identically in the
> piece I'm engraving, I just get a dashed line where I should see the barring
> indication, and I can't see why it works with one and not the other.
>
> Foo.ly and foo.png - test and output as expected.
> Barrios.ly and barrios.png - shows only a dashed line over bar 7 where the
> barre indication should be.
Since the overrides in \barre use \once, it must be placed directly
before the note where the text span starts, otherwise all the settings
are forgotten:
\barre #0.0 "CIV" #'(0 . 0) <d-4>->\startTextSpan
foo.ly
Description: Text Data
foo.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: v2.11.58-2 guile17 error ppc, (continued)
- Questions on beaming and barring, Nick Payne, 2008/09/17
- Re: Questions on beaming and barring, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/09/17
- Re: Questions on beaming and barring, Neil Puttock, 2008/09/17
- RE: Questions on beaming and barring, Nick Payne, 2008/09/19
- RE: Questions on beaming and barring, Nick Payne, 2008/09/19
- Message not available
- Re: Questions on beaming and barring, Neil Puttock, 2008/09/19
- RE: Questions on beaming and barring,
Nick Payne <=
- RE: Questions on beaming and barring, Nick Payne, 2008/09/22
- Message not available
- Re: Questions on beaming and barring, Neil Puttock, 2008/09/22
Re: v2.11.58-2 guile17 error ppc, Stan Sanderson, 2008/09/15