[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:13:00 -0300 |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Michael David
Crawford<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Peter Chubb wrote:
>>
>> Han-Wen> More importantly: LilyPond is single-threaded, so the number
>> Han-Wen> of cores is irrelevant.
>
> While LilyPond may be single threaded, in general the underlying operating
> system is multithreaded. It might be the case that a system call LilyPond
> depends on can get executed in a multithreaded way.
LilyPond almost does not interact with the OS except for reading and
writing a couple of files. It's CPU bound.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/02
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim McNamara, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Pierre Couderc, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/09/03