[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:52:13 +0200 |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Frank Steinmetzger<address@hidden> wrote:
> W00t, I got only
> real 5m47.699s
> user 5m32.306s
> sys 0m11.697s
> on my linux system (C2D @ 2 GHz), but I'm still on 2.12.1, which gave me some
> error messages, though the PDF was created. Perhaps 2.13 is a little
> faster(?)
Actually, I stumbled upon something very odd: though I haven't the
exact numbers, with 2.12 my opera used to compile in ~40 minutes on
Win32, ~25 minutes on Linux64 -- but now that I have upgraded to the
latest git sources (that include Joe's recent work on vertical
spacing), it takes more than... 90 minutes!!!
(the PDF looks nicer though).
I'll investigate this problem a bit more, as I can hardly believe it myself.
Regards,
Valentin
- Re: Lilypond Speed, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/02
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim McNamara, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Pierre Couderc, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/09/04