[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL vs. LGPL
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL vs. LGPL |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:10:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Feifan Zhou <address@hidden> writes:
> The links do raise interesting points; however, VLC is covered by
> GPLv2. I do not feel that I am authorized to make the legal
> distinctions between v2 and v3; could someone more versed in this
> issue enlighten me on the differences as they pertain to this issue?
None. "No additional restrictions", and you'd have the same with GPLv1.
It is pretty much the guiding principle and whole point of the GPL as a
license.
--
David Kastrup
- RE: GPL vs. LGPL, (continued)
Re: GPL vs. LGPL, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/11/26
Re: GPL vs. LGPL, Mike Blackstock, 2010/11/26
Re: GPL vs. LGPL, Nick Payne, 2010/11/26
Re: GPL vs. LGPL, craigbakalian, 2010/11/26