|
From: | Nick Payne |
Subject: | Re: Slurs are better than ties at automatically avoiding collisions |
Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:23:51 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
On 10/04/11 22:09, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Nick Payne" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hiddenYes, the slur really does avoid collisions much better. Here's png output from the actual score where I encountered the problem - all elements are being placed automatically with no overrides. When using a tie, it collides with the beam and the fingering. Replace the ties with slurs, and the slur is automatically displaced upwards from its normal location to avoid both the beam and fingering.Have you tested whether it actually avoids the beam better, or if it's not just simply placed differently anyway?See below. If I have a tie between the two Gs in the top voice, it collides with the beam. If I fake the tie with a slur, it automatically avoids the beam. \version "2.13.58" \relative c'' { << { g'2 ~ g } \\ { s1 } \\ { b,8 g a b ~ b a b a } \\ { g,2 g } >> } \relative c'' { << { g'2( g) } \\ { s1 } \\ { b,8 g a b ~ b a b a } \\ { g,2 g } >> }
Nick
tie.png
Description: PNG image
slur.png
Description: PNG image
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |