[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ledger line visibility issue
From: |
Peter Gentry |
Subject: |
Re: Ledger line visibility issue |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:21 +0100 |
Thanks very much for all
the suggestions - I will try them out.
Yes, I am wanting to set a
lower limit to how close notes are squeezed to meet the "page-breaking = #ly:page-turn-breaking" requirement
so that ledger lines do not almost overlap producing something akin to a moire
pattern .
I need to think more carefully
about page turns possibly change the squeezing just for the affected bars.
Thinking cap on...Some music just does not allow nice page turns maybe I'll just
have to get the scissors out?
Syntax is a huge problem - the
manuals often provide several ways to achieve a result fine but they almost
never indicate the full syntax and the required context. This is not a
complaint - I can imagine the complexity and breadth of the program.
This with its many highly skilled contributors makes a single unified
context an extremely difficult goal to achieve.
Could I suggest that the
tutorial is rather too quick to drop from the full input context down to short
snippets which leaves the learner confused not knowing which sections of input
to assume are implied and where to slot the snippet and what else is implied by
the snippet.
For instance when combining
music files into a part score via a "\include somemusic.ly" in the \newstaff
section I seem to need the <<.....>> construct which is not the same as {...} .
I feel like a tyro
who thinks he has just about understood the basics of C++ and is
thrown by the more complex structures on page 100...I need to understand the
overall context before I can reliably fiddle with the components but life is
short.
I have looked at the templates
but these (quartets for example) seem to be far more complex than files I have
prepared for quartets is there any move to allow users to share their files
under the Lilypond umbrella many of us have our own modest web sites or are
copyright problems to onerous to allow this?
regards
Peter Gentry