lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax


From: Janek Warchoł
Subject: Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:07:31 +0200

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>> Now i'm *totally* puzzled.  What do you mean by "programs"? Do you
>> mean that allowing standalone durations, like c2 d 4 4 => c2 d2 d4 d4,
>
> The first 4 in there is not standalone, so  c2 d 4 4 => c2 d4 d4 and
> c2 d2 4 4 => c2 d2 d4 d4
>
> "standalone" has nothing to do with spaces.  It just means that the
> duration has no preceding note to attach to.

Ah!!  This totally makes sense to me now.  Thanks for clarifying!
So, it seems to me that allowing standalone durations doesn't have
horribly bad side-effects.  Yeah, i think this can be a nice change.

cheers,
Janek



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]