[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how to call these notes?
From: |
Matthew Collett |
Subject: |
Re: how to call these notes? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:24:57 +1300 |
On 18/10/2012, at 2:47 am, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>
>> The Harvard Concise says that originally (c. 1675-1725), acciaccatura was
>> the crush, but it did not have a special notation. The others are all called
>> appoggiatura. The slashed grace note notation was invented in the 19th
>> century, and some came to incorrectly call them acciaccatura.
>
> The Harvard Concise is not in my possession. I do have a copy of Haydn's
> Keyboard Concerto No. 11 in D. The acciaccatura (small eight notes with
> diagonal stroke "tied" to the principal note) appears multiple times in the
> first and third movements. This concerto was published in 1782.
Very likely. The 19th century did _not_ invent the slashed grace note
notation, only the convention that a slashed grace note represents an
'acciaccatura' or 'short appoggiatura', while an unslashed one represents a
'long appoggiatura'. A slashed quaver grace note in Haydn means exactly the
same as an unslashed semiquaver one; the performer must decide from the context
whether 'long' or 'short' is intended.
Best wishes,
Matthew
- Re: how to call these notes?, (continued)
- Re: how to call these notes?, Owain Sutton, 2012/10/16
- Re: how to call these notes?, David Rogers, 2012/10/16
- Re: how to call these notes?, David Rogers, 2012/10/16
- Re: how to call these notes?, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/16
- Re: how to call these notes?, Stefan Thomas, 2012/10/16
- Re: how to call these notes?, Hans Aberg, 2012/10/17
- RE: how to call these notes?, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2012/10/17
- Re: how to call these notes?, Stefan Thomas, 2012/10/17
- Re: how to call these notes?, David Rogers, 2012/10/17
- Re: how to call these notes?, Hans Aberg, 2012/10/17
- Re: how to call these notes?,
Matthew Collett <=
- RE: how to call these notes?, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2012/10/16