Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper

[David Kastrup]

Christ van Willegen <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Uh, are we still talking about LilyPond?
>> Maybe I wasn't clear enough, and maybe this should actually have been
>> written in a private email.
>> I'm not refering to LilyPond's code base, but to the source code of some
>> edition projects we have been talking about recently.
>> These should be done in a way so they can serve as examples of
>> collaborative editing, and their source code should look organized
>> enough so we can show them around as examples.
>
> Ask Wilbert about the LyBoek project...

Is that a "work title"?  The official title is Liedboek, as in
<URL:http://www.liedboek.nl/>

> 1000 rendered pages of music for people in the churches, plus 1000's
> more for choir and piano/organ/guitar/whatnot players. All done in the
> course of just a year, IIRC. Well, planning took more, of course, but
> note entry was a hugely parallel undertaking, and Git was used for
> version tracking.

An exposition of the project logistics would be interesting, yes.

-- 
David Kastrup