[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SMuFL
From: |
David Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: SMuFL |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:53:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> writes:
> Emmentaler is, in effect, proprietary, although free.
I disagree. I think "so poorly documented that in practice almost no one
can understand how it works" still can't qualify as "in effect
proprietary".
It just qualifies as "needing a huge amount of work; work that there is
absolutely no one on earth who BOTH wants to do it and already knows
how".
I guess that leaves three possibilities for Emmentaler:
- Someone who doesn't really want to (but is fully capable of) writing
two very specific major pieces of documentation - "Successfully Using
Emmentaler Outside of Lilypond" and "Jarlsberg: A Start-to-Finish
Guide to Creating New Drop-In Replacements for Emmentaler" - decides
to spend time writing them anyway.
- Or: Someone who wants to write those docs but has no idea how, spends an
inordinate amount of time and energy learning it by himself.
- Or: Everyone waits to see what will happen.
--
David
- Re: SMuFL, (continued)
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL,
David Rogers <=
- Re: SMuFL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/08/17
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Carl Peterson, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Johan Vromans, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/11