[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reminder accidentals with octaviation
From: |
pls |
Subject: |
Re: Reminder accidentals with octaviation |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:42:26 +0100 |
On 20.11.2013, at 12:25, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please consider the situation in the attached (or inline?) image.
>
> <eecjhibe.png>
>
> a chord is repeated an octave higher, which is indicated by an \ottava.
> Does the repeated chord need accidentals or not?
> Both accidentals in the first chord are necessary (not reminder) accidentals,
> so the repeated chord actually has _different_ notes and should need
> accidentals of its own. But somehow it seems ridiculous to print them again
> at the same staff position.
>
> Are there rules for this? Do you have any opinions?
Gould's gut feeling says you should "repeat an accidental if sounding at a
different octave, even when the same pitch is used with an octave sign".