[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reminder accidentals with octaviation
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reminder accidentals with octaviation |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:58:55 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
pls <address@hidden> writes:
> On 20.11.2013, at 12:25, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> a chord is repeated an octave higher, which is indicated by an \ottava.
>> Does the repeated chord need accidentals or not?
>>
>> Are there rules for this? Do you have any opinions?
> Gould's gut feeling says you should "repeat an accidental if sounding
> at a different octave, even when the same pitch is used with an octave
> sign".
Huh. That appeals more to my mathematician's gut than my musician's.
--
David Kastrup