[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rolled Chord
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Rolled Chord |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:15:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noeck <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
>> My limited experience with the computer language for commands suggests two
>> things.
>> 1. The command requires a " = t." It should be tieWaitForNote = t.
>> 2. Commands can contain other symbols, "\," " ' (apostrophe), " and " #. "
>
> This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond.
Not really. It's still gobbledygook but you can get along with less ook
in it. Which means that it's easier to get right if you don't know what
you are doing. But it's not really easier to actually understand what
you are doing.
> Which version do you use? You can (for most settings) now forget about
> the #'. The scheme value 'true' is still ##t. The only
> counter-intuitive thing left is the # after the = .
>
> That leads to what you’ve already found by now:
> tieWaitForNote = ##t
Yup. In a context definition or modification.
--
David Kastrup
- Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/27
- Re: Rolled Chord, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/27
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/27
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Rolled Chord, Tim Slattery, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28