[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rolled Chord
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: Rolled Chord |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:53:08 -0800 |
Joram,
Thank you for the explanation. Having no knowledge or experience with Scheme, I
did not know the need for, or purpose of, the hash mark(s), " # " or " ##. "
My initial inquiry was prompted by locating the command " tieWaitForNote
(boolean). " I understand boolean. Of the use of " \set " and the hash marks, I
did not.
Learning some basic syntax and grammar of Scheme would help me. Any suggestions?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Noeck [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:44 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; address@hidden
Subject: Re: Rolled Chord
> Gentlemen,
>
> I have tried both (in 2.18),
> \set tieWaitForNote = ##t, works
> \set tieWaitForNote = #t, does not work.
>
> Mark
I think nobody said that it should work. In both ways of thinking, you need ##t
- switch to scheme syntax with # and then the scheme true value #t
(this is what actually happens), i.e. ##t
- "lilypond true" combination ##t
Joram
- Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/27
- Re: Rolled Chord, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/27
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/27
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, David Kastrup, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Tim Slattery, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Noeck, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- RE: Rolled Chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/01/28
- Re: Rolled Chord, Tim Slattery, 2014/01/29