Re: midi2ly doesn't follow time signatures (beat divisions)

[Urs Liska]

Am 20.02.2014 03:09, schrieb Paul Morris:
> For what it's worth, if anyone is looking for ways to improve midi2ly, the 
> first footnote of this blog post:
> http://blog.steinberg.net/2014/02/development-diary-part-the-fifth/#fn-523-1
>
> notes that midi2ly does not follow the beat divisions of the time signature 
> when it decides how to represent tied notes (or rests):

Yes, the very best response to such a post would be to comment on it in 
a few weeks reporting that we have fixed the issue ;-)

But the rest of the post is also interesting. You surely noticed that 
Daniel states the obvious deficiencies of Finale and Sibelius with rest 
positioning, displays LilyPond's output as considerably better and 
states that they want to be even better than that.

I think this is a demonstration of respect (that is noticeable in most 
of what he writes anyway).

So please don't start ratning in the comments (again). We had this at 
the beginning of its existence, and it's good that we've overcome the 
urge to abuse Steinberg's blog as a free "advertising platform".


Urs