[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:41:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
> address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> 2014-03-13 15:44 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>>
>>> Well, yeah. But that's still awful to use. I have not bothered
>>> cleaning up the function (it should really use reduce for finding the
>>> minimum), but one can make the calling much more pleasant.
>>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>> May I add it to the LSR ?
>>
>
> You're asking David K., but let me just interject for a moment:
>
> I'll post a revision of this in a little while. It incorporates reduce as
> David K. suggests, and it also allows you to specify alignments as pairs:
> left/center/right of one to left/center/right of the other.
You should likely also use interval-index instead of doing your own code
internally. It's shorter and much more flexible as it is not restrained
to LEFT/CENTER/RIGHT.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, (continued)
- Re: Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2014/03/13
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Matthias Hüsken, 2014/03/13
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/13
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/14
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/15