[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Displaying add9
From: |
Jan Kohnert |
Subject: |
Re: Displaying add9 |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Dec 2014 01:01:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 23:14:14 schrieb Big Noise:
> there's a snippet that can help:
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=459
[…]
> Does that help your issue?
that one helped to get the stuff out to the colleagues, so thanks! But still,
looking at the sourcecode, it seems more like a workaround than a real
solution. I consider it to be a bug.
Personally, I know of two major versions of displaying that stuff:
1.: <c e g d'> == Cadd9 and <c e g b d> == C9
2.: <c e g d'> == C9 and <c e g b d> == C7/9
Nothing I ever read, made <c e g d'> == <c e g h d>, simply because it's just
wrong.
There was another chord, which I couldn't make print the right way: Cadd11. It
whould be <c e g f'> but neither c1:11^7^9 (which I considered to be right
Lilypond-Syntax), nor c11^7.9 (which was my second chance input) gave the
correct result. And C11 (what was displayed in both trials) is just wrong,
since it whould be <c e g b d f>, which is a totally different chord.
Any of the devs there, who can clearify this one?
--
MfG Jan
- Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Big Noise, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9,
Jan Kohnert <=
- Re: Displaying add9, Big Noise, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2014/12/05
- Re: Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/06
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/08
- Re: Displaying add9, Phil Holmes, 2014/12/08
- Re: Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/09
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/09
- Re: Displaying add9, Johan Vromans, 2014/12/10
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/10