[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Displaying add9
From: |
Jan Kohnert |
Subject: |
Re: Displaying add9 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:27:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi,
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2014, 08:45:24 schrieb Knute Snortum:
> The latest version I could find that displayed "add9" for 9^7 is 2.14.2.
> Somewhere between that and 2.16.2 we lost the ability.
good to know, I thought 2.16 still had the ability. I tried to compile latest
2.16, but I'm not easily able to do so due to python and autotools stuff
unavailable on recent Gentoo. So I'll just believe you. :)
> I tend to think of this as a regression bug, although an old one. c:9^7 is
> not the same as c:9. As I use "add9" a lot I would like to see this
> function restored. Should I post to bugs?
Though it's not a real regression (see Phil's mail), it should be reported.
Whould you do that, or do you want me to do so? Since you seem to have easy
access to older versions of lilypond, you could be the better contact person.
:) If you don't want to file a bug, please give a short response, and I'll
file it and post the link here, probably you could help with some small pics
of older versions then.
Thanks again, and thanks to Phil, too!
--
MfG Jan
- Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Big Noise, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Big Noise, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2014/12/04
- Re: Displaying add9, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2014/12/05
- Re: Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/06
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/08
- Re: Displaying add9, Phil Holmes, 2014/12/08
- Re: Displaying add9,
Jan Kohnert <=
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/09
- Re: Displaying add9, Johan Vromans, 2014/12/10
- Re: Displaying add9, Knute Snortum, 2014/12/10
- Re: Displaying add9, Jan Kohnert, 2014/12/10
Re: Displaying add9, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2014/12/08