On Friday, January 2, 2015, Thomas Morley <
address@hidden> wrote:
2015-01-02 21:26 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
<address@hidden>:
> Please send us a compilable exemple (showing what goes wrong), e.g. :
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> {
> c,^\markup\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
> }
>
> which, on my side, works perfectly !
I think the problem was to print the fretdiagram _with_ fingering.
Try:
\version "2.18.2"
{
c''1^\markup\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
\once \override TextScript.fret-diagram-details.finger-code = #'in-dot
c''^\markup\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
\once \override TextScript.fret-diagram-details.finger-code = #'below-string
c''^\markup\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
}
%% other syntax
{
c''1^\markup\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
c''1^\markup
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . ((finger-code . in-dot)))
\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
c''1^\markup
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . ((finger-code . below-string)))
\fret-diagram-terse #"2-2;o;1-1;o;"
}
Though, I think it's well covered in the NR.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#fret-diagram-markups
Ryan could you suggest something how we could improve the docs, so
that the problem finding the relevant explanation will be avoided in
future?
Cheers,
Harm