[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:36:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Hi Jim,
concerning ligatures, you can forget about my paper block. It was just there,
because I know this font has ligatures. This markup line should be all you need:
>> \markup "Ligatures: The Que fi fl"
> What is special about that markup syntax that tells lily that
> there are any ligatures present in the markup?
There is nothing special in the syntax. The backend should know itself, that the
font has some ligature defined which means f and i following one another are not
separate letters fi but combined into a combined symbol: fi
And (if defined in the font) the same holds for: f + l = fl and others.
Is it clearer now?
Here is more about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typographic_ligature
Cheers,
Joram
- Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Noeck, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Noeck, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, tisimst, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Kevin Barry, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Noeck, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, Kevin Barry, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, tisimst, 2015/02/12
Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, lilypond, 2015/02/12
- Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions,
Noeck <=
Re: Broken ligatures in recent LilyPond versions, lilypond, 2015/02/12