[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:Levelling hairpins
From: |
David Sumbler |
Subject: |
Re:Levelling hairpins |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:56:57 +0000 |
> From: Noeck <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:15:35 +0100
>
> Hi David,
>
> > It's a shame that Lilypond does not (so far as I know) have any way to
> > (a) associate one mark with another for positioning purposes
>
> This association can be done quite easily as you can see in my previous mail.
> Have you seen it? However, I already found some drawbacks when used on the
> same
> note as other (de-)crescendi.
I have now, and it is very interesting: I may make use of this.
One of the drawbacks of receiving the lilypond-user digests is that
sometimes I am responding to something that has already had other
responses which I have not yet seen (because they will be in the next
digest).
But with half a dozen to a dozen digests daily, I don't think I can face
changing to individual emails. Although perhaps I should consider doing
that when there is a topic under discussion which I have started (or
have contributed to).
David
Re:Levelling hairpins, David Sumbler, 2015/02/14
Re:Levelling hairpins,
David Sumbler <=