[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: After-line-breaking behavior?
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: After-line-breaking behavior? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:30:18 +0200 |
2015-06-17 0:12 GMT+02:00 Steven Weber <address@hidden>:
> Is there any way to guarantee that the order of items processed through
> after-line-breaking is the exact order they are in the score? I’m doing
> some fun things with bar lines, and I’m having issues because my scheme code
> isn’t getting them in the order I expect. In the attached file, for
> example, I expected that I would get the bar lines in order: start repeat,
> end repeat, start repeat, end repeat, final bar line. Instead, I get start
> repeat, end repeat, end repeat, start repeat, final. If you comment out the
> break on line 40, it gets even odder: start repeat, end repeat, final bar
> line, start repeat, end repeat.
>
>
>
> I’ve tried with both 2.18.2 and 2.19.21 and get the same behavior, so this
> isn’t a regression – maybe I’m just not understanding how
> after-line-breaking works?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --Steven
Testing your code, I get:
Unbroken bar line: .|:
Unbroken bar line: :|.
Unbroken bar line: .|:
Unbroken bar line: :|.
Left-broken bar line: |.
That's exactly:
start repeat, end repeat, start repeat, end repeat, final bar line.
Am I missing something?
Anyway, are you sure you want to show 'glyph, not 'glyph-name?
Cheers,
Harm