[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sharping naturals
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: sharping naturals |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:07:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Wols Lists <address@hidden> writes:
> On 25/07/15 08:04, David Kastrup wrote:
>> If we wanted to support "natural English note entry", it would become
>> LilyPond's problem.
>
> As an irrelevant aside :-)
>
> Throwing another little spanner in the works - about what words mean ...
>
> I really hate it when people say "English", and mean "American" ...
>
> (yes, we use the same names for pitch, but we do not use the same names
> for length ...)
Because UK went metric and the US loves the royals so much they stuck
with Imperial?
At any rate, Americans tend to write C4 instead of c' so I am not sure
why you are objecting against my characterization.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: sharping naturals, (continued)
- Re: sharping naturals, Brother Gabriel-Marie, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Hans Aberg, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, J Martin Rushton, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/25
- Re: sharping naturals, Wols Lists, 2015/07/25
- Re: sharping naturals,
David Kastrup <=
- Note notation, Hans Aberg, 2015/07/25
- Re: sharping naturals, Malte Meyn, 2015/07/25
Re: sharping naturals, Hans Aberg, 2015/07/25
Re: sharping naturals, Tim Reeves, 2015/07/27