[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Note notation
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Note notation |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:26:20 +0200 |
> On 25 Jul 2015, at 09:04, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
>> Whether or not that is the key signature the OP wants to work in would
>> be the OP’s problem.
>
> If we wanted to support "natural English note entry", it would become
> LilyPond's problem.
LilyPond’s current system is just fine: it follows how staff notation works,
and can easily be extended to other pitch systems, as in the C++14 code I
already have written.
LilyPond’s lacks accidental operator syntax, though. An accidental is an
interval of scale degree 0 that is added to a note. So one might introduce the
notion of intervals as well.
- Re: sharping naturals, (continued)
- Re: sharping naturals, Brother Gabriel-Marie, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Hans Aberg, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, J Martin Rushton, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/07/24
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/25
- Re: sharping naturals, Wols Lists, 2015/07/25
- Re: sharping naturals, David Kastrup, 2015/07/25
- Note notation,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: sharping naturals, Malte Meyn, 2015/07/25
Re: sharping naturals, Hans Aberg, 2015/07/25
Re: sharping naturals, Tim Reeves, 2015/07/27