[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision
From: |
Mark Knoop |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:08:19 +0000 |
At 22:57 on 12 Jan 2016, Urs Liska wrote:
>Am 12.01.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>> What should the behavior of the *last* one be here?
>> No beams over the rest.
>
>Well, default behaviour is to break the beam at all rests here (see
>attached).
Not sure if this is relevant to your current work on this, but it would
be great to have a global override to create beams over rests WITHOUT
having to manually enter them. The implementation would need quite some
thought as to the kind of parameters needed, e.g. maximum-rest-value,
minimum-beam-count, etc.
--
Mark Knoop
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, (continued)
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision,
Mark Knoop <=
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/13