[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:05:58 +0100 (CET) |
>> No beams over the rest.
>
> But if the user manually enters the beam enclosing the rest there
> should be *something*.
Ah, ok, I missed this.
> And I think a single beam is better here than a number of steamlets.
I agree.
Werner
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, (continued)
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Mark Knoop, 2016/01/13
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/13