lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alignment of ‘non-extremal’ bass figures


From: Simon Albrecht
Subject: Re: Alignment of ‘non-extremal’ bass figures
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:52:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 16.01.2016 12:48, Richard Shann wrote:
The syntax Denemo uses is this

<10 9>4
\once \override Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning #'Y-offset = #'7
You could use Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning.Y-offset here – unless you want to support 2.16 syntax, but other than that there’s no reason, I think.
I like \markup\transparent 8 better as a solution.
<8>4

Interestingly, with the figures  above the notes, following the heights
of the notes (i.e. the 18th c style figures) no override is needed for
this example.

But would be for <9 3> <8> – so that’s a little beside the point.

LilyPond's default style is (as always) late 19th century, when the
figures were only of academic interest, not intended to be used for a
continuo player to create an accompaniment at sight.

Good point, I’ll consider that. My reasoning was that if the figures are below the Continuo staff in full score, they aid in better visual separation of the systems. If I were to make a part, I’d put them above the staff, but the continuo player will play from full score – as they most often do today – so there will be no need for a part.

Yours, Simon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]