[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond logo?
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond logo? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:27:47 +0200 |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200
Malte Meyn <address@hidden> wrote:
> But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a
> combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail,
> only one pad but with gap -> more typical).
Yes, simplicity is better. However, this looses the typical 'lotus'
appearance of a waterlily.
See e.g.
https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon
http://www.freepik.com/free-icon/lotus_864201.htm
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-150336194/stock-vector-lotus-symbol.html
-- Johan
- Re: LilyPond logo?, (continued)
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Marc Hohl, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Marc Hohl, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Alexander Kobel, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Anthony Youngman, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Alexander Kobel, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Noeck, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Malte Meyn, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/08/05
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Johan Vromans, 2016/08/06
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Noeck, 2016/08/06
- Re: LilyPond logo?, Anthony Youngman, 2016/08/05