Re: LilyPond logo?

[Simon Albrecht]

Actually I like No. 10 best for its simplicity, elegance and recognition value.

But as I said before: I don't think this quite unordered process fit for creating and selecting a logo. In the end, those who cry out loudest might have their will, while there has been no agreement even on how the selection should be done. Or do I have too little faith in crowd intelligence and the aesthetic reckoning of everybody who likes working with Lilypond?

 

Best, Simon

Am 07-Aug-2016 17:11:44 +0200 schrieb address@hidden:

Pierre:

 

 

 

Nix 4, 5, 10, and 11.

 

 

 

Thank you

 

 

 

Mark

 

 

 

From: lilypond-user [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Pierre Perol-Schneider
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM
To: Noeck <address@hidden>
Cc: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: LilyPond logo?

 

 

 

pdf

 

 

 

2016-08-07 14:13 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden>:

 

Updates.

 

Please select the ones that should be deleted.

 

Cheers

 

Pierre

 

 

 

2016-08-07 9:34 GMT+02:00 Noeck <address@hidden>:

 

Hi,

> I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for
> the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe.

It's a little bit different (in short: women):

http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/newweb/out/site/about/name

Cheers,
Joram

 

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user