[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple markings
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple markings |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:48:25 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 04/02/17 14:10, David Sumbler wrote:
> So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does not
> allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
Probably because the underlying code makes it very tricky.
>
> If the answer to that question really is "yes", then perhaps we could
> have an additional grob or 2 which have the same characteristics as the
> existing one(s) but without the restriction on numbers. E.g. could we
> have a TextMark grob in addition to RehearsalMark?
Kieran put in a lot of effort iirc to add all this extra stuff. I
remember things from long ago when it was "one mark per barline" and,
because I think RehearsalMark resolved to an ordinary mark you couldn't
even put a rehearsal mark on the same barline as an ordinary mark. That
even that took so long to appear implies it was NOT simple.
I suspect if Kieran could have just stacked marks he would have done. He
might chime in and tell us. If you want to look at how a tempo mark is
implemented you might be able to do it for yourself :-) That said, I
wanted to do it and just couldn't get to grips with it :-)
But I think if you want multiple marks the obvious solution is to stack
them in a column.
Cheers,
Wol
- Multiple markings, David Sumbler, 2017/02/04
- Re: Multiple markings,
Wols Lists <=
- Re: Multiple markings, David Sumbler, 2017/02/06
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/06
- Re: Multiple markings, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, David Kastrup, 2017/02/07
Re: Multiple markings, Thomas Morley, 2017/02/07