[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple markings
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple markings |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:25:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Wols Lists <address@hidden> writes:
> On 07/02/17 13:39, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Wols,
>>
>>> I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
>>> ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
>>> underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That
>>> was very frustrating back then.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean by “back then”?
>>
>> I can’t even remember a time when this was a problem, and I’ve been
>> using Lilypond since 2003.
>> Perhaps by complete coincidence I just never had \mark and \tempo at
>> the same moment until 2.17 (when I know for sure it worked fine).
>>
> Before then :-) - some time last century :-)
>
> I started using lily with 2.4, and I was forever cursing that "feature".
> I don't know if the empty chord workaround worked then, either.
> Certainly I didn't know of it.
>
> I thought you wrote the code that sorted it.
You are probably confusing Kieren MacMillan with Keith O'Hara.
--
David Kastrup
- Multiple markings, David Sumbler, 2017/02/04
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/04
- Re: Multiple markings, David Sumbler, 2017/02/06
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/06
- Re: Multiple markings, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings, Wols Lists, 2017/02/07
- Re: Multiple markings,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Multiple markings, Thomas Morley, 2017/02/07