[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \mark and slur
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: \mark and slur |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2017 22:04:06 +0200 |
2017-09-16 21:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> If I understand correctly, with this patch [issue 5581] things like
>>> below are now possible:
>>>
>>> xxx = c4
>>> { \xxx -- }
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> and
>
>>> #{ $m -. #}
>>
>> Yes. #m -. should be fine as well.
>>>
>>> Which is a big, big goody!
>>
>> Well, it's mostly convenience that allows using LilyPond syntax instead
>> of Scheme.
>
> And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation. Because someone for
> some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than
> inventing examples using it...
Absolutely no idea which person you may have in mind ...
> If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be
> too far away...
Will do, at least for regtests and as soon as I find some time.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: \mark and slur, (continued)
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/18
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/18
- Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), David Kastrup, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), Thomas Morley, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23