[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \mark and slur
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: \mark and slur |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:22:35 +0200 |
2017-09-16 22:21 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2017-09-16 21:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>>> And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation. Because someone for
>>> some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than
>>> inventing examples using it...
>>
>> Absolutely no idea which person you may have in mind ...
>>
>>> If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be
>>> too far away...
>>
>> Will do, at least for regtests and as soon as I find some time.
>
> Thanks. Sorry for my mental laziness.
You? Lazy? Rubbish!
Here my suggestion for a regtest. Not sure if we discuss/demonstrate
problems in regtests, though.
Ofcourse the title would be removed (only done for demonstration here)
and surpressing the warning probably needs to be adjusted, depending
how 5194 will be done finally.
Cheers,
Harm
regtest-5181.png
Description: PNG image
regtest-5181.ly
Description: Text Data
- Re: \mark and slur, (continued)
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/18
- Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), David Kastrup, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), Thomas Morley, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23