[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partcombine for choir and piano?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: partcombine for choir and piano? |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:02:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noeck <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> reading about \partcombine recently stirs up some questions. I always
> considered it a tool for orchestra scores (violins of flutes). But
> perhaps it's not limited to that.
>
>
> My questions (and some short reasoning):
>
> 1. Does \partcombine make sense for combining *soprano and alto* into
> one staff or should I use voices?
Voices in my opinion.
> I see pros (+) and cons (-):
>
> - The fact that I would prefer the 'apart' style everywhere makes me
> think that it's perhaps not what \partcombine is intended for.
> = From a quick test, \partcombineApart is equivalent to two voices.
> Are there exceptions?
> + The positioning of dynamics is better for partcombine.
> Why are all dynamics below the staff for the voices-setup by default?
>
>
> 2. Does \partcombine make sense for *piano music* with different voices
> starting here and there?
>
> - Probably not as the 2...n voices are never used independently, so
> I'd be better off writing voices explicitly as necessary.
I think it makes sense for piano _extracts_. For original piano scores,
you usually want to be in control of the voicing.
--
David Kastrup