|
From: | antlists |
Subject: | Re: Current octave in relative mode |
Date: | Sun, 17 May 2020 00:28:29 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
On 17/05/2020 00:04, David Kastrup wrote:
antlists <address@hidden> writes:On 16/05/2020 23:19, David Kastrup wrote:As I say, I think this function or something similar has made its way into lilypond proper.What advantage over the solution using make-relative that I posted do you see here?Because if I understand the OP correctly, what he wants is \resetRelativeOctave, which is already a standard part of lilypond?What he wants is music used twice within a function not to end up in different octaves.
Isn't that what \resetRelativeOctave does? His description seems exactly to match my problem with Pennsylvania 6-5-0-0-0
It was an example which - obviously - predated both \resetRelativeOctave and \makeRelative (you did notice the "version 2.8.0" at the start?)I'm guessing Han Wen's resetOctave is its predecessor. So I guess - at the third attempt - my solution is the best because it doesn't need a custom function at all :-)make-relative has been part of LilyPond in its current form since 2.18.0. I am not sure what you call "custom function" in this context. Particularly since your proposal contained a large amount of code.
I couldn't remember what \resetRelativeOctave was, so I was trying to give him the clues he needed to find it. I did explicitly say "I think it's now a standard part of lilypond" (implying it wasn't when that code was written).
So let's give a very simple example of what I think he was trying to achieve ...
arpeggio = { c e g c } \new Staff { \relative c' { \arpeggio \resetRelativeOctave c' \arpeggio \resetRelativeOctave c' \arpeggio } }Despite being in relative mode, all the arpeggios will now start on middle C. The OP's eXample is more complicated but as far as I can tell this is what he's aiming at.
Oh - and I believe arpeggio = { \resetRelativeOctave c' c e g c }would also work. I don't know for certain because I haven't had this problem since Pennsylvania.
Cheers, Wol
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |