RE: Rests vertical position problem

[Mark Stephen Mrotek]

Jacques, 

Most welcome.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacques Menu [mailto:address@hidden] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:00 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>
Cc: Jacques Menu <address@hidden>; lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Rests vertical position problem

Hello Mark, 

Thanks a lot, I looked at the snippets doc and missed that…

Will make good use of it!

JM

> Le 19 mai 2020 à 16:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Jacques,
> 
> Look at
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=merge+rests
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=address@hidden] 
> On Behalf Of Jacques Menu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:32 AM
> To: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Rests vertical position problem
> 
> I know I could use \rest to control the placement of rests manually, but this 
> code is created from MusicXML automatically.
> musicxml2ly exhibits the same behaviour as the first score shown, BTW.
> 
> JM
> 
>> Le 19 mai 2020 à 09:25, Jacques Menu <address@hidden> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello folks,
>> 
>> In the attached example, the \voiceOne and \voiceTwo commands used for the 
>> first score lead to the eigth rests in measure 2 to appear too high.
>> 
>> Removing them as in the second score makes the look more satisfying in this 
>> regard, but then measure 1 gets awful.
>> 
>> Is there a way to use some equivalent of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo 
>> measure-wise in such a case, using it only in measures that have more than 
>> one voice playing?
>> 
>> Thanks for your help!
>> 
>> JM
>> 
>> <PastedGraphic-2.tiff>
>> 
>> <RestsVerticalPositionProblemSubmittedToList.ly>
> 
>