lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Rests vertical position problem


From: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Subject: RE: Rests vertical position problem
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 07:45:24 -0700

Jacques,

Look at
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=merge+rests

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=address@hidden] On 
Behalf Of Jacques Menu
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 12:32 AM
To: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Rests vertical position problem

I know I could use \rest to control the placement of rests manually, but this 
code is created from MusicXML automatically.
musicxml2ly exhibits the same behaviour as the first score shown, BTW.

JM

> Le 19 mai 2020 à 09:25, Jacques Menu <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> In the attached example, the \voiceOne and \voiceTwo commands used for the 
> first score lead to the eigth rests in measure 2 to appear too high.
> 
> Removing them as in the second score makes the look more satisfying in this 
> regard, but then measure 1 gets awful.
> 
> Is there a way to use some equivalent of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo measure-wise 
> in such a case, using it only in measures that have more than one voice 
> playing?
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> JM
> 
> <PastedGraphic-2.tiff>
> 
> <RestsVerticalPositionProblemSubmittedToList.ly>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]